Engaged or Sugar Coated interaction?
Keyword: Balance.
Key thought: Learning should be fun, but in an engaged - flow state - sort of way.
I picked up this post over at Godfrey Parkin’s site.
Parkin’s Lot: Who says learning should be fun?
“The distinction between engagement and interactivity is crucial, and it’s one that many instructional designers – and those who commission the development work – do not appear to understand. Engagement is intense mental absorption; interactivity is often just busyness or sugar-coating. It is vitally important that learners be engaged. Interactivity, entertainment, and fun can contribute to cognitive engagement. They can equally well distract from it.” Godfrey Parkin
Reflection: How is my classroom? Am I working to create ENGAGED learning experiences? Or am I just handing out sugar coated interaction?
I think true engagement (The kind Parkin is referring to) means slipping into a flow state. It’s where real fun and real learning takes place.
